| |
Contemporary Reviews
of “Wuthering Heights”
Notes: Wuthering Heights was initially published under the
ambiguous pseudonym of "Ellis Bell" so many early reviewers
believed it to be written by a man. Some also believed that Currer
Bell (Charlotte) and Ellis Bell (Emily) were the same.
The book was first published in December 1847.
Reviews marked with
* were found in Emily's desk after her death.
Reviewer: Unknown
Publication: Spectator
Date: 18
December 1847
An attempt to give novelty and interest to fiction, by resorting to
those singular 'characters' that used to exist everywhere, but especially
in retired and remote places. The success is not equal to the abilities
of the writer; chiefly because the incidents are too coarse and disagreeable
to be attractive, the very best being improbable, with a moral taint
about them, and the villainy not leading to results sufficient to justify
the elaborate pains taken in depicting it. The execution, however, is
good: grant the writer all that is requisite as regards matter, and the
delineation is forcible and truthful.
*Reviewer: Unknown
Publication: Unknown
Date: about
1847
This
is a work of great ability, and contains many chapters, to the production
of which talent of no common order has contributed. At the same time,
the materials which the author has placed at his own disposal have
been but few. In the resources of his own mind, and in his own manifestly
vivid perceptions of the peculiarities of character in short, in his
knowledge of human nature—has he found them all. An antiquated
farm-house, a neighbouring residence of a somewhat more pretending description,
together with their respective inmates, amounting to some half a dozen
souls in each, constitute the material and the personal components of
one of the most interesting stories we have read for many a long day.
The comfortable cheerfulness of the one abode, and the cheerless discomfort
of the other—the latter being less the result of a cold and bleak
situation, old and damp rooms, and (if we may use the term) of a sort
of 'haunted house' appearance, than of the strange and mysterious character
of its inhabitants—the loves and marriages, separations and hatreds,
hopes and disappointments, of two or three generations of the gentle
occupants of the one establishment, and the ruder tenants of the other,
are brought before us at a moment with a tenderness, at another with
a fearfulness, which appeals to our sympathies with the truest tones
of the voice of nature; and it is quite impossible to read the book—and
this is no slight testimony to the merits of a work of the kind—without
feeling that, if placed in the same position as any one of the characters
in any page of it, the chances would be twenty to one in favour of our
conduct in that position being precisely such as the author has assigned
to the personages he has introduced into his domestic drama. But we must
at once impose upon ourselves a task—and we confess it is a hard
one—we must abstain (from a regard to the space at our disposal)
from yielding to the temptation by which we are beset to enter into that
minute description of the plot of this very dramatic production to which
such a work has an undoubted claim. It is not every day that so good
a novel makes its appearance; and to give its contents in detail would
be depriving many a reader of half the delight he would experience from
the perusal of the work itself. To its pages we must refer him, then;
there will he have ample opportunity of sympathising,—if he has
one touch of nature that 'makes the whole world kin'—with the
feelings of childhood, youth, manhood, and age, and all the emotions
and passions which agitate the restless bosom of humanity. May he derive
from it the delight we have ourselves experienced, and be equally grateful
to its author for the genuine pleasure he has afforded him.
*Reviewer: Anonymous
Publication: Examiner
Date: 8
January 1848
This is a strange book. It is not without evidences of considerable
power: but, as a whole, it is wild, confused, disjointed, and improbable;
and the people who make up the drama, which is tragic enough in its consequences,
are savages ruder than those who lived before the days of Homer. With
the exception of Heathcliff, the story is confined to the family of Earnshaw,
who intermarry with the Lintons; and the scene of their exploits is a
rude old-fashioned house, at the top of one of the high moors or fells
in the north of England. Whoever has traversed the bleak heights of Hartside
or Cross Fell, on his road from Westmoreland to the dales of Yorkshire,
and has been welcomed there by the winds and rain on a 'gusty day', will
know how to estimate the comforts of Wuthering Heights in wintry weather....
If this book be, as we apprehend it is, the first work of the author,
we hope that he will produce a second,—giving himself more time
in its composition than in the present case, developing his incidents
more carefully, eschewing exaggeration and obscurity, and looking steadily
at human life, under all its moods, for those pictures of the passions
that he may desire to sketch for our public benefit. It may be well also
to be sparing of certain oaths and phrases, which do not materially contribute
to any character, and are by no means to be reckoned among the evidences
of a writer's genius. We detest the affectation and effeminate frippery
which is but too frequent in the modern novel, and willingly trust ourselves
with an author who goes at once fearlessly into the moors and desolate
places, for his heroes; but we must at the same time stipulate with him
that he shall not drag into light all that he discovers, of coarse and
loathsome, in his wanderings, but simply so much good and ill as he may
find necessary to elucidate his history—so much only as may be
interwoven inextricably with the persons whom he professes to paint.
It is the province of an artist to modify and in some cases refine what
he beholds in the ordinary world. There never was a man whose daily life
(that is to say, all his deeds and sayings, entire and without exception)
constituted fit materials for a book of fiction.
*Reviewer: Anonymous
Publication: Douglas Jerrold's
Weekly Newspaper
Date: 15 January 1848
Wuthering Heights is a strange sort of book,—baffling
all regular criticism; yet, it is impossible to begin and not finish
it; and quite as impossible to lay it aside afterwards and say nothing
about it. In the midst of the reader's perplexity the ideas predominant
in his mind concerning this book are likely to be—brutal cruelty,
and semi-savage love. What may be the moral which the author wishes the
reader to deduce from his work, it is difficult to say; and we refrain
from assigning any, because to speak honestly, we have discovered none
but mere glimpses of hidden morals or secondary meanings. There seems
to us great power in this book but a purposeless power, which we feel
a great desire to see turned to better account. We are quite confident
that the writer of Wuthering Heights wants but the practised
skill to make a great artist; perhaps, a great dramatic artist. His qualities
are, at present, excessive; a far more promising fault, let it be remembered,
than if they were deficient. He may tone down, whereas the weak and inefficient
writer, however carefully he may write by rule and line, will never work
up his productions to the point of beauty in art. In Wuthering Heights
the reader is shocked, disgusted, almost sickened by details of cruelty,
inhumanity, and the most diabolical hate and vengeance, and anon come
passages of powerful testimony to the supreme power of love—even
over demons in the human form. The women in the book are of a strange
fiendish-angelic nature, tantalising, and terrible, and the men are indescribable
out of the book itself. Yet, towards the close of the story occurs the
following pretty, soft picture, which comes like the rainbow after a
storm....
We strongly recommend all our readers who love novelty to get this story,
for we can promise them that they never have read anything like it before.
It is very puzzling and very interesting, and if we had space we would
willingly devote a little more time to the analysis of this remarkable
story, but we must leave it to our readers to decide what sort of book
it is.
*Reviewer: Anonymous
Publication: Atlas
Date: 22
January 1848
Wuthering Heights is a strange, inartistic story. There are
evidences in every chapter of a sort of rugged power—an unconscious
strength—which the possessor seems never to think of turning to
the best advantage. The general effect is inexpressibly painful. We know
nothing in the whole range of our fictitious literature which presents
such shocking pictures of the worst forms of humanity. Jane Eyre is
a book which affects the reader to tears; it touches the most hidden
sources of emotion. Wuthering Heights casts a gloom over the
mind not easily to be dispelled. It does not soften; it harasses, it
extenterates.... There are passages in it which remind us of the Nowlans of
the late John Banim but of all pre-existent works the one which it most
recalls to our memory is the History of Mathew Wald. It has
not, however, the unity and concentration of that fiction; but is a sprawling
story, carrying us, with no mitigation of anguish, through two generations
of sufferers—though one presiding evil genius sheds a grim shadow
over the whole, and imparts a singleness of malignity to the somewhat
disjointed tale. A more natural story we do not remember to have read.
Inconceivable as are the combinations of human degradation which are
here to be found moving within the circle of a few miles, the vraisemblance is
so admirably preserved; there is so much truth in what we may call the costumery (not
applying the word in its narrow acceptation)—the general mounting
of the entire piece—that we readily identify the scenes and personages
of the fiction; and when we lay aside the book it is some time before
we can persuade ourselves that we have held nothing more than imaginary
intercourse with the ideal creations of the brain. The reality of unreality
has never been so aptly illustrated as in the scenes of almost savage
life which Ellis Bell has brought so vividly before us.
The book sadly wants relief. A few glimpses of sunshine would have increased
the reality of the picture and given strength rather than weakness to
the whole. There is not in the entire dramatis persona, a single
character which is not utterly hateful or thoroughly contemptible. If
you do not detest the person, you despise him; and if you do not despise
him, you detest him with your whole heart. Hindley, the brutal, degraded
sot, strong in the desire to work all mischief, but impotent in his degradation;
Linton Heathcliff, the miserable, drivelling coward, in whom we see selfishness
in its most abject form; and Heathcliff himself, the presiding evil genius
of the piece, the tyrant father of an imbecile son, a creature in whom
every evil passion seems to have reached a gigantic excess—form
a group of deformities such as we have rarely seen gathered together
on the same canvas. The author seems to have designed to throw some redeeming
touches into the character of the brutal Heathcliff, by portraying him
as one faithful to the idol of his boyhood—loving to the very last—long,
long after death had divided them, the unhappy girl who had cheered and
brightened up the early days of his wretched life. Here is the touch
of nature which makes the whole world kin—but it fails of the intended
effect. There is a selfishness—a ferocity in the love of Heathcliff,
which scarcely suffer it, in spite of its rugged constancy, to relieve
the darker parts of his nature. Even the female characters excite something
of loathing and much of contempt. Beautiful and loveable in their childhood,
they all, to use a vulgar expression, 'turn out badly'. Catherine the
elder—wayward, impatient, impulsive—sacrifices herself and
her lover to the pitiful ambition of becoming the wife of a gentleman
of station. Hence her own misery—her early death—and something
of the brutal wickedness of Heathcliff's character and conduct; though
we cannot persuade ourselves that even a happy love would have tamed
down the natural ferocity of the tiger. Catherine the younger is more
sinned against than sinning, and in spite of her grave moral defects,
we have some hope of her at the last....
...We are not quite sure that the next new novel will not efface it,
but Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights are not things
to be forgotten. The work of Currer Bell is a great performance; that
of Ellis Bell is only a promise, but it is a colossal one.
Reviewer: Anonymous
Publication: New Monthly Magazine
Date: January 1848
Wuthering Heights, by Ellis Bell, is a terrific story, associated
with an equally fearful and repulsive spot. It should have been called
Withering Heights, for any thing from which the mind and body
would more instinctively shrink, than the mansion and its tenants, cannot
be imagined. ...Our novel reading experience does not enable us to refer
to anything to be compared with the personages we are introduced to at
this desolate spot – a perfect misanthropist's heaven.
Reviewer: Anonymous
Publication: Tait's Edinburgh Magazine
Date: February 1848
This novel contains undoubtedly powerful writing, and yet it seems to
be thrown away. We want to know the object of a fiction. Once people
were contented with a crude collection of mysteries. Now they desire
to know why the mysteries are revealed. Do they teach mankind to avoid
one course and to take another? Do they dissect any portion of existing
society, exhibiting together its weak and its strong points? If these
questions were asked regarding Wuthering Heights, there could
not be an affirmative answer given...
Mr Ellis Bell, before constructing the novel, should have known
that forced marriages, under threats and in confinement are illegal,
and parties instrumental thereto can be punished [see
FAQ]. And second, that wills made by young ladies' minors are invalid
[see Legal Aspects].
The volumes are powerfully written records of wickedness and they have
a moral – they show what Satan could do with the law of Entail.
Reviewer: Anonymous
Publication: Paterson's Magazine (USA)
Date: March 1848
We rise from the perusal of Wuthering Heights as if we had
come fresh from a pest-house. Read Jane Eyre is our advice, but burn
Wuthering Heights...
Reviewer: Anonymous
Publication: Graham's Lady's Magazine (USA)
Date: July 1848
How a human being could have attempted such a book as the present without
committing suicide before he had finished a dozen chapters, is a mystery.
It is a compound of vulgar depravity and unnatural horrors...
*These reviews were found in Emily's desk after her
death.
|
|